Legal Opinion
State v. Wildenstein
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1978No. 3308PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant was found to be an habitual offender on the basis of felony convictions in 1959 and 1977. He asserts the trial court erred in granting the prosecutor’s motion to fingerprint defendant on the morning of trial. This claim does not challenge the fingerprinting in itself. State v. Jamerson, 85 N.M. 799, 518 P.2d 779 (Ct.App.1974). Rather, defendant claims the trial court erred because the motion was untimely. Defendant’s claim of prejudice is not supported in the record. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion on the basis of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MoserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LobbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State v. O'NEILNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. FishNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PinoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Littlefield v. State Ex Rel. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.