Legal Opinion

Hendryx v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. The case is stated iu the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

StraNC?, C.:

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for injuries received by the plain*378tiff’s intestate, through the alleged negligence of the defendant, in operating its train of cars, from the effects of which he died. The defendant was, on the 27th day of August, 1886, running its train of freight cars south, over its line, from Pleasanton to Fort Scott. At Pleasanton, the deceased, Willie Hendryx, went into a box-car of said train, to steal a ride to Fort Scott. There was one other person in the car with him, called in the evidence in this case a “tramp.” At…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. GantsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Stone v. C. & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Mason v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. LindleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad v. Van HoutenIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Purple v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. M'Neill v. Durham & Charlotte RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. McNeill v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. McNeill v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API