Legal Opinion

Maresh v. Yamhill County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 1984No. LCDC 3-83; CA A28829Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Yamhill County petitions for review of an order in a post-acknowledgment proceeding of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). The order invalidated the county’s Ordinance 322. Respondents filed objections with LCDC against the ordinance’s rezoning of two quarry sites from an agricultural-forestry (AF) to a mineral resource (MR) designation. LCDC held, inter alia, that the ordinance violates Goal 5 and that the county is required and failed to take a Goal 2 exception to Goal 3 in connection with the rezoning. Although we find one of the county’s argument’s for reversing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shannon v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Roth v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Woodcock v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Coats v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API