Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of McChesney
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 15, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tuck, S.
In this judicial settlement proceeding it appears that Hattie Hammond and Edna Leverance, daughters of Alice E. McChesney, deceased, are and have been for some years past patients at Utica State Hospital.
The daughters above mentioned of the decedent are adults and both are married. Hattie Hammond has one child, Edna H. Hammond, who is an adult, and Edna Leverance has a daughter, Betty Leverance, who is a minor.
Neither husband is, so far as the facts appear, of sufficient financial ability to compensate the State for hospital expenses, and neither of the incompetent persons possessed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- In re the Accounting of WesleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- In re the Final Accounting of NugentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of WrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Paramount Enterprises, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- In re the Accounting of SaundersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of LeounisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1991