Legal Opinion

BETTS v. ARMSTRONG

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided May 5, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00341Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA AMY BETTS, individually and on behalf ) of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:25CV341 ) STEPHEN BRETT ) ARMSTRONG, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff Amy Betts’ application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docket Entry 1.) Plaintiff has also filed an “Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction.” (Docket Entry 3.) As an…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API