Legal Opinion

– State v. Fox

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 2019No. 115247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,247 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. VIRGIL PATRICK FOX, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The one-year statute of limitations for moving to withdraw a plea in K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22-3210(e)(1) begins to run for preexisting claims on the date the amended statute became effective, April 16, 2009. A motion filed after the statute of limitations has expired may be granted only if the movant establishes excusable neglect. 2. An appellate court generally reviews the denial of a postsentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea for an abuse of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. State v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. DavissonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. SzczygielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. Jay N. Giannukos v. Terra Morehead, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  3. State v. LingenfelterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  5. State v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API