Mudd v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Presiding Judge.
Charles Mudd appeals his jury convictions of two Class C felonies under IND. CODE 35-48-4-10, dealing in marijuana by manufacturing, and possession of marijuana with intent to manufacture. Sentenced to concurrent five-year terms for these convictions, appellant contends that the two charges are duplicative, so that he may be convicted and sentenced for only one count of dealing in marijuana. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and alleges ineffective assistance of counsel.
Because appellant's first contention is correct, we must reverse in part. We note…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beaty v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Bigler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Settle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Phillips v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Loman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.