Loman v. State

RILEY, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Allen Loman appeals his convictions of two class D felonies: obtaining a controlled substance by fraud or deceit1 and possession of a controlled substance.2

We affirm Loman’s conviction of obtaining a controlled substance but order his conviction of possession vacated.

ISSUES

Loman raises two issues for our review:

1. Did the trial court err by admitting telephone conversations into evidence?

2. Is the evidence sufficient to support Loman’s convictions?

We raise an additional issue sua sponte:

1. Do Loman’s convictions for possession of a controlled substance and…