Legal Opinion

Wade v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1892No. 542PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. Action by F. M. Wade to restrain the city of Tacoma from amending its charter, which the city was proceeding to do in accordance with a section of the charter providing for the publication of proposed amendments in the official newspaper for thirty days. From the judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*86The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J. —

The only question involved in this case requires the construction of § 10 of art. 11 of the state constitution. Said section, after providing the manner in which a city of twenty thousand inhabitants or more shall be permitted to frame a charter, and for its submission to the qualified electors of said city, proceeds as follows:. “Said proposed charter shall be published in two daily newspapers published in said city, for at least thirty days prior to the day of submitting the same to the electors for their approval, as above provided. All…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Linn v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Hindley v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Griffin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API