Legal Opinion
Nathan v. Regent Laundry Service, Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 14, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.
It may be, as the defendant’s counsel urges, that by the defendant’s by-laws the defendant’s secretary was merely a ministerial officer whose duties were limited strictly to the per*544formance of such work as was merely secretarial in character. The defendant offered no evidence of what its by-laws prescribed as to its secretary’s functions. There was evidence to show that the defendant’s secretary’s activities were not confined to duties of a clerical nature. And two witnesses were called by the plaintiff, each of whom testified that he had been hired and discharged by defendant’s secretary.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hastings v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hooker v. . Eagle Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Bacon v. Montauk Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Traitel Marble Co. v. Brown Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Bangs v. National Macaroni Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of QuintanaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936