DePetrillo v. Lepore
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs, Russell and Donna DePe-trillo (plaintiffs or DePetrillos), ask this Court to rule that a real estate purchase and sale agreement is specific enough for specific performance. They appeal from the Superior Court’s dismissal in favor of the defendant, Norman Lepore a/k/a Le-pore Farm (defendant or Lepore), after the court determined that it would not order specific performance because the contract was not sufficiently clear, definite, certain, and complete as to its essential terms.
This matter came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on March 8, 2005, pursuant to an…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastern Motor Inns, Inc. v. RicciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- Griffin v. ZapataSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- McDaniel v. SilvernailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Thompson v. McCannSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Vigneaux v. CarriereSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Fisher v. ApplebaumSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- ADP Marshall, Inc. v. NORESCO, LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010
- Bucklin v. MorelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Keystone Properties & Development, LLC v. CampoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- King v. KingSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.