Legal Opinion

Hendren v. Hill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1936No. 29635PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clements, District Judge.

This is an action brought by Janet Hendren, plaintiff, against Charles A. Hill, defendant, to recover for damages which she says she sustained while riding as a guest in his car.

The plaintiff alleges that she was injured in a collision of the defendant’s automobile with the car of a third party; that the defendant was guilty of gross negligence in driving his car at the time of and immediately prior to the accident, and that such negligence was the proximate cause of the accident and her injury.

The defendant denies negligence on his part; alleges that plaintiff was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koehn v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. LaFleur v. PoeschNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lewis v. Rapid Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fulcher v. IkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gleason v. BaackNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Fischer v. MeganNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lindgren v. City of GeringNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Redwelski v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API