Sanders v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNOR, Justice.
A jury convicted Rodney Glen Sanders, appellant, of delivery of cocaine, found the two enhancement paragraphs to be true, and assessed punishment at 25 years confinement. Sanders appeals on four grounds. We reverse.
I. The proof of enhancement
In his first point of error, Sanders contends the State did not prove a final conviction was entered against him in cause number 306233, as alleged in the first enhancement paragraph. There are two parts to Sanders’ argument: The State did not prove a final conviction was entered in cause number 306233, and the State did not prove that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Carlson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Spaulding v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Whitehead Vincent v. Bulldog Battery Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Benefield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.