Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hay v. Isetts

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 3, 1929Published

1Concurrence

Whatever may have been the method of obtaining and effectuating appeals in chancery causes in England or in Florida prior to 1873, (Sec. 2 Enc. Pl. Prac. 209; pages 92 and 108, Fla. Territorial Acts 1832) pursuant to authority conferred by Section 75, Chapter 1096, Acts 1861, Section 3, Chapter 1626, Acts 1868, Sections 2 and 12, Chapter 1938, Acts 1873, now Section 4682, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927, the Supreme Court of Florida adopted May 26, 1873, Chancery Rule 95 which provided that "When an appeal is entered in the circuit court in a chancery cause, the appellant, at the time of entering the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Andreu v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. Trustees Internal Improvement Fund v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1864
  4. State ex rel. Cartmel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
  5. Henry Vogt Machine Co. v. Milton Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API