Holmes v. Helms
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
William Holmes and Jack Lenhardt petition for review of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) orders denying their petitions for exemption from certain FAA medical standards. We affirm.
FACTS:
Federal Aviation Regulations require the pilot of an airplane to have both a pilot certificate and a medical certificate. 14 C.F.R. § 61.3(a), (c). The FAA medical certification procedure is discussed in detail in Delta Airlines, Inc. v. United States, 490 F.Supp. 907 (N.D.Ga.1980), and is not chai*345lenged in this case. The FAA determined, in separate proceedings, that each petitioner had failed to satisfy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Communications Commission v. WNCN Listeners GuildSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tiger International, Inc. And the Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Maurice Keating, Jr. v. Federal Aviation Administration and Langhorne M. Bond, Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Union Oil Company of California v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Go Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board & Donald D. Engen, Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Richard Essery v. Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Barney J. Tearney v. National Transportation Safety Board and T. Allan McArtor Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.