Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlton Victor Smith Thomas Albert Nichols John Herbert Crisp
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 18, 2003No. 01-5466, 01-5468 and 01-5469PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Carlton Victor Smith, John Herbert Crisp, and Thomas Albert Nichols challenge, on several grounds, their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to commit bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2113, following bank extortions that occurred in Knoxville, Chattanooga, and Clarksville, Tennessee. Smith also challenges his money laundering conviction . in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. Addition ally, Nichols challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in support of his firearm convictions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(c)(1). For the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. William StiversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BuddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.