Baltimore & O. R. v. United States
Commerce Court
Petition by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company and others, with the Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, John Arbuckle, and Wil- liam A. Jamison; as intervening petitioners, against the United States, with the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Sugar Refining Company as intervening respondents. Final hearing on motions to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAND, Judge.
The petition in this case was filed April 12, 1911, and seeks to have annulled and set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated March 6, 1911, the provisions of which are hereinafter stated. On April 19, 1911, upon its own petition, the Federal Sugar Refining Company was made a party defendant, with leave to appear and be represented by counsel. On May 11, 1911, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Sugar Refining Company filed a motion to dismiss the petition, for the reason that the facts set forth therein did not constitute a cause of action,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. DiffenbaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Central Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Terminal Warehouse Co. of Baltimore City v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1929