Chrisman v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from White Circuit Court. Hon. John Whytock, Circuit Judge.. The judgment upon the appeal bond in the Circuit Court was an extinguishment of the bond given in the attachment before-the justice, and released all liens given by the judgment of the justice.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from White Circuit Court. Hon. John Whytock, Circuit Judge.. The judgment upon the appeal bond in the Circuit Court was an extinguishment of the bond given in the attachment before-the justice, and released all liens given by the judgment of the justice. See Briscoe v. Sandefur et al.r 14 Ark., 569 ; Phillips et al. v. Wills, Pease & Co., ib., 595; Dougherty v. McDonald, ib.. 597: Rector v. Harris, Norton & Go., 19 Ark., 265; Neele vJeter, 20 Ark., 98. The court should have reduced the finding to writing. Const.. of 1868, art. 11, sec. 7. The judgment is excessive. It should at most…
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, J.:
Rogers, as administrator, brought suit by attachment against • Thomas J. Glasscock, before a justice of the peace, upon a noté, of $118.18. A writ of attachment issued, and was levied on the property of Glasscock, and personal service, was made upon Glasscock, who, for the purpose of dissolving the attachment and releasing his property, executed bond to the plaintiff, with Francis M. Chrisman, Robert I. Glasscock and William Hicks as sureties, in the penal sum of $332, conditioned that if the defend-* ant should answer the plaintiff’s demand, and pay and satisfy such judgment as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farrar v. LyonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
- Hoagland v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Town of Louisiana v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
3Cited by1 opinion
- Albertsworth v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948