Commonwealth v. Shellenberger
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.
A jury convicted the defendant of one count of motor vehicle homicide by negligent operation under G. L. c. 90, § 24G(h). On appeal, she contends that (1) a medical record, which contained only a vague reference to an unquantified amount of amphetamine in her system, was unfairly transformed, during trial, into a surprise theory of criminal liability; there was no foundation for the amphetamine evidence used to sup*71port this new theory; and, in arguing that theory in his closing, the prosecutor committed error by arguing that “speed kills”; (2) the instructions on causation were inadequate;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. SitkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. KirkpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DubeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LampronMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BouleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. TheisenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.