Legal Opinion
Minion Inc. v. Burdin
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided May 29, 1996No. 1:99-adr-00001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McAULIFFE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Minion Inc. and Futamu Sakurai, filed a three-count complaint against William T. Burdin, Esq., alleging legal malpractice. Count I charges Burdin with negligence, and Count II alleges breach of contract. In Count III, plaintiffs claim they are entitled to enhanced compensatory damages. Burdin now moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim for enhanced compensatory damages for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons discussed below, Burdin’s motion is necessarily denied.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
A motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Nieves v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Dcpb, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, Dcpb, Inc. v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Thompson v. ForestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Michnovez v. Blair, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- Precourt v. Fairbank Reconstruction Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- Bartlett v. Mutual PharmaceuticalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Bartlett v. Mutual PharmaceuticalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.