Legal Opinion · Dissent

Januchowski v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2009No. 64A03-0806-CV-330Published

1DissentDarden, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority's conclusion that this action is not barred by Indiana's two-year statute of limitations. Despite my heartfelt sympathy for Mr. Januchowski, who suffered grievous injuries that gave rise to his claim, I agree with the trial court as to the law in this regard.

It is undisputed that Indiana courts and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction with respect to a claim under FELA. 45 U.S.C.A. § 56. As a result, in my opinion, when a FELA action is adjudicated in an Indiana state court, we apply "state procedural rules" and "federal substantive law." Gouge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gouge v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Saintignon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. MarronIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API