Legal Opinion

Radecki v. Radecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: The question here presented is whether or not the decedent when he executed the deed and delivered it to his attorney intended “ to divest himself of his right to withdraw, revoke or control the instrument as completely as though he were deUvering it ” to the grantees. "Whether or not the intention existed and was expressed is a question of fact solvable by a consideration of the other facts. While the question as to whether there was a delivery of the instrument, in the legal sense, under a state of facts, is a question of law, it is a question of fact whether the facts, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KilgallenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  2. Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Geiselhart v. LoomisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. In re the Accounting of BonannoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  5. Matter of Estate of RohrerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API