Radecki v. Radecki
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: The question here presented is whether or not the decedent when he executed the deed and delivered it to his attorney intended “ to divest himself of his right to withdraw, revoke or control the instrument as completely as though he were deUvering it ” to the grantees. "Whether or not the intention existed and was expressed is a question of fact solvable by a consideration of the other facts. While the question as to whether there was a delivery of the instrument, in the legal sense, under a state of facts, is a question of law, it is a question of fact whether the facts, which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of KilgallenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
- Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Geiselhart v. LoomisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- In re the Accounting of BonannoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- Matter of Estate of RohrerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.