Legal Opinion

Wirt v. Hicks

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 23, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Bill for injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This suit is brought upon letters patent No. 260,134, granted June 27, 1882, to Marvin C. Stone, and No. 311,534, granted February 3, 1885, to the orator, for fountain pens, in which the ink is led to the nibs by capillary attraction between a lip and the pen, and in those of the latter the ink is brought within reach of the attraction by an extension of the lip into the reservoir. The defendants’ pens are made under George H. Sackett, and letters patent No. 349,753, granted to him September 28, 1886. These inventions were under consideration on substantially the same evidence in Sackett v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Eagleton Manufacturing Co. v. West, Bradley & Carey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Eagleton Manufacturing Co. v. West, Bradley & Cary Manufacturing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wirt v. FarrellyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API