Legal Opinion

Moe v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 1995No. 9304-02245; CA A81115PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals the judgment of the trial court affirming a Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) license suspension order for refusing to submit to a breath test. ORS 813.100(3). We affirm.

The MVD hearings officer found the following facts, which plaintiff does not dispute. Plaintiff consumed three alcoholic beverages before getting into the passenger seat of his friend’s parked car. His friend got into the driver’s seat, put the keys in the ignition, then changed his mind and got out of the car to urinate. Meanwhile, plaintiff wanted to open the car’s electric windows. He turned on the ignition,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BilsborrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Carrigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Bekos v. Providence Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
  4. Magee v. DyrdahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. NekoliteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API