Slocum v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentWertz, J.
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion of the court, and I will set forth my views wherein I differ.
A few of the pertinent facts relating to plaintiff’s extensive permanent injuries, disability and terrible suffering going to justify the verdict returned by the jury are as- follows:
Donn Slocum, an active twelve-year-old boy at the time of his accident, came into contact with a noninsulated power line carrying 13,800 volts of electricity. The current entered his left hand, charred to a crisp the muscle, fascia, fat and tendons of that hand and wrist, passed through his body and came…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spangler v. Helm's New York-Pittsburgh Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Domann v. PenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Henderson v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Pearson v. HannaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. MillikenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.