Legal Opinion

Lake Erie Nursery & Seed Co. v. Edwards

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1925No. Appeal 204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The court below -entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The plaintiff’s claim was for $370 — for nursery stock consisting of various trees sold and delivered to the defendant in accordance with a written contract signed by the defendant. The contract contained a clause: “This order is not subject to countermand, and this contract' covers all terms, conditions or agreements between the purchaser and agent in relation to ■ said order.”

The defense is, first, that the plaintiff induced the defendant to sign the contract by stating that such trees as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Tranter Manufacturing Co. v. BlaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East Coast Fi. Corp. v. LinckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Campbell v. Rhoads, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API