Lake Erie Nursery & Seed Co. v. Edwards
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
The court below -entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
The plaintiff’s claim was for $370 — for nursery stock consisting of various trees sold and delivered to the defendant in accordance with a written contract signed by the defendant. The contract contained a clause: “This order is not subject to countermand, and this contract' covers all terms, conditions or agreements between the purchaser and agent in relation to ■ said order.”
The defense is, first, that the plaintiff induced the defendant to sign the contract by stating that such trees as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Tranter Manufacturing Co. v. BlaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- East Coast Fi. Corp. v. LinckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Campbell v. Rhoads, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1927