United States v. John Bizzell, and Charles Kent Bizzell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion to dismiss a criminal indictment on double jeopardy grounds. Defendants, who engaged in real estate transactions in Oklahoma, argue because they have been subjected by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to civil sanctions arising from the same circumstances which predicate the criminal charges, they have already been placed once in jeopardy and the criminal charges are barred. We conclude the civil sanctions visited on defendants were in the nature of restitution…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Certain Real Property and Premises Known as 38 Whalers Cove Drive, Babylon, New York, Edward J. Levin, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Luk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- United States v. Robert S. StollerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.