Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Ball

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 31, 1967No. 65-1486PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAUK, District Judge.

This action was initiated derivatively on behalf of Desilu Productions, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Desilu”, in a complaint alleging that the individual defendants, as officers and directors of defendant Desilu, approved, permitted to be paid, and paid excessive compensation to defendant Lucille Ball during the years 1963 through 1965.

Jurisdiction of this court has been invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as amended,1 inasmuch as there is diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and defendants and the matter in controversy *330exceeds the sum of $10,000, exclusive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Fidelity Inv. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. Pelelas v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Partridge v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
  5. Massaro v. Fisk Rubber CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,592 Paulette Papilsky v. Alvin H. Berndt, and Carl W. KnoblochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Manes v. GoldinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  3. Baham v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1972
  4. Brookhaven Housing Coalition v. SampsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  5. Katz v. AspinwallDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API