State v. Wilt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge.
|2On appeal, defendant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an Anders1 brief on defendant’s behalf, asserting there is no basis for a non-frivolous appeal. Further, defendant has filed a pro se supplemental brief assigning three errors. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s conviction and remand for re-sentencing and correction of the commitment.
Procedural History
On August 1, 2011, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant, Julius S. Wilt, Jr., with home invasion in violation of La. R.S. 14:62.8(B)(2).2…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CliftonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. JamisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. BarbainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. BenoitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Lanard Lavigne Versus State of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.