Legal Opinion

Barr v. Barr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1996No. WD 51008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The issue here is whether the following provision, part of a separation agreement incorporated into a dissolution decree, was triggered, terminating an obligation for further maintenance:

“Said maintenance shall earlier terminate upon the death of either party, [wife’s] conjugal cohabitation with an adult male for a period of sixty (60) days, or remarriage of [wife].” (emphasis added).

The motion court found in favor of the former husband, Kent, concluding that his former wife, Kitty, had conjugally cohabited with a man for sixty days. Both parties have appealed. Kitty claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of WilfongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Marriage of Herzog v. HerzogMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Stark v. ThierjungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Brown v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Konzelman v. KonzelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Hughes v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Konzelman v. KonzelmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Wagner v. WagnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Adamson v. AdamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API