Legal Opinion

Crunk v. Glover

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1959No. 34463PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The gist of the statements of appellee as a basis for the recovery of damages because of the asserted negligence of appellant is as follows: Appellant is and has been, for several years the owner and operator of a sale barn near Nebraska City where public sales of livestock and merchandise have been conducted. Livestock is placed in pens in the barn which the public is permitted to • pass and is invited to inspect prior to when it is offered for sale. Appellant on and prior to August 3, 1957, kept a bear in one of the pens. It was, as appellant knew, untamed, savage, vicious, and dangerous,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vredenburg v. BehanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. Long v. WhalenNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Barber v. HochstrasserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Hayes v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ripp v. RieslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. RoyNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sendelbach v. GradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Meyer v. MoellNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. HE Butt Grocery Company v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API