Legal Opinion

People v. Pena

California Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2004No. S106906PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

We consider in this case the propriety of a notice form regularly utilized by the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two, in ascertaining whether appellate counsel will waive oral argument in appeals pending before that appellate court. As we shall explain, we conclude that there exists a danger that the language of the waiver notice employed here suggests too strongly (1) that the appellate court already has finally decided the case and will not be affected by oral argument, and (2) that appellate counsel might face adverse consequences if oral argument is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. ArredondoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API