Legal Opinion
C.K. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 7, 2005No. 2D04-4366PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANADY, Judge.
C.K. appeals his adjudication of delinquency and disposition for possession of marijuana and obstructing or resisting an officer without violence. Because the trial court did not comply with the requirements regarding a juvenile’s waiver of counsel, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
At C.K’s adjudication hearing, the trial court asked C.K. if he had an attorney. C.K. answered no, and the trial court asked if he intended to obtain one. C.K. answered no, and the trial court asked, “Do you understand that if you could not afford to hire an attorney, I would appoint one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. T.G.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- D.C.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- J.M.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3Cited by17 opinions
- G.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- L.D.S.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- H.A.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- A.M.E. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.