G.T. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CANADY, Judge.
G.T. appeals his adjudication of delinquency for possession of cannabis, possession of drug paraphernalia, escape, resisting or obstructing an officer with violence, and trespass. G.T. contends that the trial court committed fundamental error by accepting his waiver of counsel without conducting the thorough inquiry required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165. Because we agree that the trial court fundamentally erred in failing to conduct a thorough inquiry concerning G.T.’s comprehension of the offer of counsel, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
During…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. T.G.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- C.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- P.L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- H.A.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by7 opinions
- A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- D.A.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- A.M.E. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- AME v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- As v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.