Norviel v. Norviel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WUNDERLICH, J.
This appeal arises from bifurcated proceedings in a marital dissolution action. The question before us is whether the trial court erred in determining the parties’ date of separation. In particular, we must consider what it means for spouses to live separate and apart.
The trial court determined that the parties separated in June 1998, when the husband stated his intention to end the marriage. The wife challenges that determination. She asserts that there was no conduct demonstrating a final break in the marriage until many weeks later. Among other things, she *1155cites…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Marriage of MarsdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Marriage of DekkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Makeig v. United Security Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- State v. BrecheisenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alfred Minasyan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Marriage of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Manfer v. ManferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Doe v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Marriage of Alexis CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.