Legal Opinion
State v. Brecheisen
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1984No. 7365PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for criminal sexual penetration (CSP) which resulted in personal injury to the victim, in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-9-ll(B). The CSP conviction occurred following defendant’s second trial on the charge. At the first trial the jury returned a verdict against him for misdemeanor battery and disorderly conduct but could not reach agreement regarding CSP. The trial court declared a mistrial and ordered a new trial on that charge alone. The record of the second trial provides the basis for this appeal.
Defendant raises the following…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. SegottaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. James M.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. BachichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.