Legal Opinion

Odom v. Walker

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1943No. 35151PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

Walker, appellee, obtained a judgment against Odom and Tillery, appellants, for personal injuries caused by a fall which resulted, so Walker alleged, from his compliance with an urgent order of appellants, as masters, to him, as their servant, directing him into a dangerous and unsafe place to work, while he was engaged as a carpenter in the employ of appellants in the construction of a dwelling house.

Appellants first say that Walker is precluded from recovery because he knew of the dangerous condition of the place into which he was ordered to go. The dangerous condition consisted in this: A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Herrin, Lambert & Co. v. DalyMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Standridge v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Gulf, M. N.R.R. Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Robertshaw Trustees v. Columbus & G. Ry. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Tupelo v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Catholic Diocese of Natchez-Jackson v. JaquithMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Capital City Ins. v. GB" Boots" SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. PETERMANN v. GaryMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  4. City of Jackson v. ReedMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Albert R. Dicks v. Frank D. Cleaver, Rodney W. Nielsen v. Frank D. CleaverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API