Legal Opinion

Albert R. Dicks v. Frank D. Cleaver, Rodney W. Nielsen v. Frank D. Cleaver

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1970No. 28734_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. BEOWN, Chief Judge:

The problem here is whether a jury, required under the classic test for estoppel to decide whether a party has been misled into action by the adversary, is entitled to know the facts bearing upon who the real party is. More specifically it is whether, in an otherwise run-of-the-mill automobile tail-gating damage suit, the plaintiffs were entitled to prove that the same insurance company was both the workmen’s compensation insurer and automobile liability insurer of the named defendant. We hold such testimony to have been here admissible and reverse.

The injuries…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio v. May Spach, as Receiver for Ro-Ben, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Robert T. Clegg v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Lancaster v. LancasterMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. PETERMANN v. GaryMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ayers v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Landers v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Parliament Insurance Company v. Adrian HansonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Reed v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Green Construction Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API