Bradshaw v. Smith
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In the case at bar the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas holds that the fees of office of a constable which have been collected by him and deposited to his credit in a bank are subject to garnishment by his judgment creditor. Smith v. Bradshaw, 105 S. W. (2d) 340. On the 7th day of July, 1937, we dismissed for want of jurisdiction the application for writ of error filed by the constable. The application is again before us, on motion for rehearing. An examination of the opinion in this case shows that it is in direct conflict with the opinion of the Fort Worth Court of Civil…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Smith v. Oak Cliff Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. ICO, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Highland Park State Bank v. SalazarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Davis v. Raborn, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Thomas v. BuehlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Davis v. Raborn, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.