Legal Opinion

Manuel v. Young

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1928No. 354PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Lance Manuel, minor son of Mayence Manuel and wife, was bitten by a dog belonging to Lucius Young. Mr. and Mrs. Manuel, father and mother of the minor, claim of said Young $700.00 in damages on said account. They allege that their son was bitten at a school which he was attending, and that the dog was reported to have been infected at the time with rabies. That their son and themselves, greatly alarmed as a result of the report about the condition of the dog, consulted a physician on account of the occurrence, and had their son undergo the Pasteur treatment. They further allege on information…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bentz v. PageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Serio v. American Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Delisle v. BourriagueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Damonte v. PattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Mercer v. MarstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woulfe v. D'AntoniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Fine v. HillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Young v. BlaumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API