Legal Opinion

McCaskill v. Barr

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1980No. 16288PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Webber

This appeal presents the rather narrow question of what is required in order to plead properly the cause of action generally known today as the tort of outrage. The plaintiff filed an original complaint, and an amended complaint, attempting to state such a cause of action, and the circuit court of Champaign County dismissed both on separate motions of the defendant. We hold that while plaintiff’s prospects of ultimate success on the merits are dubious, the dismissal was premature, and we remand.

The factual situation giving rise to the complaint is relatively uncomplicated. The parties are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Turner v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Christine K. Schroeder v. Lufthansa German AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. B.N. v. K.KCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Susanne Littlefield v. Malcolm McGuffey Susanne Littlefield v. Wally MacK Santa Maria Realty and Malcolm McGuffeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Welsh v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Welsh v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API