Legal Opinion

Danquah v. Target Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 19, 2021No. 0:20-cv-02105Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Simon Owusu Danquah, Case No. 20-cv-2105 (WMW/KMM) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS Target Corporation et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff Simon Owusu Danquah’s amended complaint. (Dkt. 11.) Defendants Target Corporation (Target) and Defendants Carrie R., Jamie K. and Brian (collectively, the Individual Defendants) move to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. In the alternative, Defendants move for an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Denise Blomker v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API