Legal Opinion
State v. McKiernan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 22, 2003No. AC 22223PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J
The defendant, Liam McKieman, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of disorderly conduct in violation of General Statutes § 53a-182 (a) (l).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly instructed the jury, (2) his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence and (3) prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. During the evening hours of October 30,1999, the defendant and the victim, his wife, along with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. OrellanaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. JarrettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. ShermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. D'HAITYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.