Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge.

Gray Smith appeals from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, granting summary judgment in favor of The Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”) and additional defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”), and against Smith. We affirm.

On or about December 12,1991, Smith rented an automobile from Hertz. At the execution of the rental agreement, Smith declined the optional loss damage waiver and agreed to be contractually liable for any and all loss or damage to the rental car, regardless of fault. While he was driving the rental car, Smith…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Davis v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Authority of Cambria County v. International Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Tremco, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers Ass'n InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Colony National Ins. v. Hing Wah Chinese RestaurantDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Russell v. Cincinnati Insurance (In re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API