Legal Opinion
Catlett v. Avis Budget Group
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided July 18, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00408Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION DALE A. CATLETT PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-cv-408-BJB AVIS BUDGET GROUP DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Dale A. Catlett, unrepresented by counsel, filed a lawsuit invoking this Court’s diversity jurisdiction. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601, 608
(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock,
594 U.S. 199
(2007).…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.