United States v. Martin Martinez-Noriega
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLay, Circuit Judge
• Booker Challenge to Martinez-Noriega’s Sentence
Although I am bound by our en banc decision in United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 (8th Cir.2005), I write separately to voice my agreement with Judge Bye’s thoughtful concurrence and dissent in Pirani, 406 F.3d at 562.
A panel of this court must engage in pure speculation when reviewing these sentences, based upon often-scant lower court records which reveal little about the district judge’s inclinations in any given case. It is indeed better to vacate and remand the majority of these cases to the judge who can say with surety what he or she…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.