Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Martin Martinez-Noriega

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2005No. 03-3648Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLay, Circuit Judge

• Booker Challenge to Martinez-Noriega’s Sentence

Although I am bound by our en banc decision in United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 (8th Cir.2005), I write separately to voice my agreement with Judge Bye’s thoughtful concurrence and dissent in Pirani, 406 F.3d at 562.

A panel of this court must engage in pure speculation when reviewing these sentences, based upon often-scant lower court records which reveal little about the district judge’s inclinations in any given case. It is indeed better to vacate and remand the majority of these cases to the judge who can say with surety what he or she…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API