Legal Opinion

Dail v. Vodicka

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1975No. File 11524PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinans, Justice

(on reassignmént)

In this action to recover a commission for the sale of real property the jury at the trial stage found for the defendants. On appeal plaintiff raises questions dealing with the admissibility of parol evidence relating to the contract, with the giving of two jury instructions and with the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Having considered all questions raised we affirm the lower court’s decision.

On August 1, 1973, Defendants Joseph and Delores Vodicka signed a “uniform sales agency contract” which gave to' Dail Realty an exclusive right, until November 1,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Best v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Eggers v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Orr v. WoolfolkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ralph E. Mueller and Eugene D. Devane, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Hubbard Milling Company, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. GMS, INC. v. Deadwood Social Club, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kimball Investment Land, Ltd. v. ChmelaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API