Legal Opinion

Winfield Constr. v. Oakton, Inc., Unpublished Decision (6-17-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 2005No. 2004-L-051Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Winfield Construction, Inc., ("Winfield") appeals from the judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, City of Painesville ("Painesville"). We affirm the decision of the trial court.

{¶ 2} In October 2000, Winfield and defendant, Oakton, Inc. entered into a purchase contract for the purchase of a triangular, 91,258 square-foot piece of property, located to the north of West Walnut Street and behind Marion Avenue. The contract of sale was contingent on the parties securing zoning approval from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wilson v. Stark County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API