Hamilton v. McDaniel
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STANFORD, Justice.
Action was brought in the superior court by plaintiffs, Fred McDaniel and his wife, appellees herein, for the purpose of quieting title in them to a portion of Lot 19, Block 2 of Mathers Subdivision, Amended, in the city of Phoenix, Arizona. The said Lot 19 measures approximately 150 feet east and west, 50 feet north and south and is the southwest corner lot of the said Block 2, bounded on the west by 13th Street, on the south by Diamond Street, on the east by Lot 13 and on the north by Lot 20.
Facts brought out at the trial indicate that plaintiffs purchased a portion of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Buckeye Irr. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Milam v. MilamArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Brooke Et Ux v. Amuchastegui Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Old Pueblo Transit Co. v. Corporation CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Fritts v. EricsonArizona Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.