Legal Opinion
State v. Barton, 21815 (5-11-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 2007No. 21815PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ENTRY
OPINION
{¶ 1} The Defendant Appellant, Sean Barton, appeals a judgment of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court overruling his motion to suppress evidence. Barton asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, claiming that the search was incident to an unconstitutional stop and detention. Finding that Barton's stop was legal, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On July 6, 2005, Officers Poe and Riegel of the Dayton Police Department were patrolling in the area of Warren and Pulaski Streets in the City of Dayton. This was a known area of high…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MillertonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. EwingOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. ShortsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. WertzOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.